Groupthink Essay -- essays research papers

GroupthinkWhat is pigeonholingthink? There is a simple definition for it, but is it truly that simple? The term themethink refers to the inclination of sort members to have the same opinions and beliefs it frequently leads to mistakes. It lots occurs without an individual being aw be of it. Conflict is considered to be a harmful element when related to throngs, but conflict is serious when considering groupthink because it helps to eliminate the cosmea of a groupthink. The explanation sounds simple enough, but it is more than complex than the rendering given.There atomic number 18 eight symptoms of groupthink. The first symptom is when all or most of the group view themselves as invincible which causes them to make decisions that whitethorn be risky. The group has an enormous amount of confidence and authority in their decisions as well as in themselves. They see themselves collectively wear out in all ways than any contrary group and they accept the event will go we ll not because of what it is, but because they are involved. The second symptom is the belief of the group that they are moral and upstanding, which leads the group to ignore the ethical or moral consequences of the decisions. The group engages in a total overestimation of its morality. There is never any question that the group is not doing the right thing, they just act. The disregarding of information or warnings that whitethorn lead to changes in past policy is the third symptom. Even if in that location is considerable evidence against their standpoint, they see no problems with their plan. Stereotyping of enemy leaders or others as weak or stupid is the fourth symptom. This symptom leads to close-mindedness to other individuals and their opinions. The fifth symptom is the self-censorship of an individual causing him to overlook his doubts. A group member basically keeps his mouth shut so the group cigarette continue in harmony. Symptom take six refers to the illusion of har mony going along with the bulk, and the assumption that silence signifies consent. Sometimes a group member who questions the rightness of the goals is pressured by others into concurring or agreeing, this is symptom number seven. The last symptom is the members that set themselves up as a cowcatcher to protect the group from adverse information that may destroy their share contentment regarding the groups ... ... that areas of expertise can be exploited, different people are good at different things. Groups can cover material, and that discussion can improve the quality of the decision. Groups are less apt(predicate) to suffer from judgmental biases that individuals have when they make decisions. People are more likely to follow through on decisions made by groups that they are connected to. Also, more monumental decisions can be made in groups, because one member will not be singled out for blame, reservation the entire group responsible.Groups however, do not always make go od decisions. Juries sometimes render verdicts that run against the evidence presented. Groups tend to fail to adequately determine their objectives and alternatives, fail to assess the risks associated with the groups decision, fail to rack through discarded alternatives and to reexamine their worth after a majority of the group discards the alternative, fail to seek expert advice, select and use whole information that supports their position and conclusions, and does not make contingency plans in grounds their decision and resulting actions fail. Many times peoples lives are affected and little thought or care is put into it.