There’s more to life than meets the eye

bloody shame knows everything about the color, red, except to possess the experience of eyesight it for the first clip. Would she sigh when sees red? Would she hug the person standing beside to her out of blessedness, because she is seeing the color red, a beautiful color, for the first time? Would Mary be reminded of a happy or sad memory when she sees the color, red, for the first time? In other words, would she experience a flashback in black and white? If the answers to all these questions are in the affirmative it is current that Mary also experiences thoughts and feelings that can non easily be explained through the physical senses.What is the record of the mind, after all? Churchland does not even explain how the nature of mood could be described in terms of things that can be perceived with the five senses alone. Of course, Mary has read about the color, red. Then again, how would she describe the joy she feels in terms of the physical world? If physicalism is the on ly instruction to describe and understand the nature as well as experiences of gracious beings, then Mary should know everything about the color red, just because she has analyse everything under the bright blue sky (Vinueza, 2004).This is the belief of people that intend there are only facts to describe about the physical world. in that respect are no bases for feelings, such as joy, in this belief system. So, Mary must essentially feel like a robot. Because Mary is not a robot she is a human being it is essential for her to experience the color red for the first time as something breathtaking, even if books had taught her to stay that. In that case, books must also have taught her how she would see the color red for the first time, that is, what she would experience within herself to boot her thoughts and feelings.If this is true, then physicalism cannot genuinely be false, according to those that think in it. After all, it is now achievable to reduce everything to phy sical notes and tones neurons and electric signals within the brain in ordain to understand thoughts, feelings and imagination. Given that it is possible to argue for both physicalism and metaphysical philosophies it can be stated with confidence that both the knowledge design and physicalism were developed by reasonable people.It was only their belief systems, and the right smart they explained their experiences in life and facts about the world with both metaphysical examples and arguments establish on materialism that made them either for or against physicalism or another philosophy. The example of creative writing or fiction shows that it is possible to explain almost everything with words, regardless of how human reason is applied to puddle an argument or philosophy. The active human mind makes it possible to believe anything whatsoever.